Colorant Chromatics™ UV Laser Marking Technology UV and Light Blocking Additives

Colorant Chromatics™ UV Laser Marking Technology UV and Light Blocking Additives

Colorant Chromatics™ UV Laser Marking Technology UV and Light Blocking Additives

Colorant Chromatics™ UV Laser Marking Technology UV and Light Blocking Additives

Colorant Chromatics™ UV Laser Marking Technology UV and Light Blocking Additives

Colorant Chromatics™ UV Laser Marking Technology UV and Light Blocking Additives

Colorant Chromatics™ UV Laser Marking Technology UV and Light Blocking Additives

Fomentar un entorno laboral que facilite las comunicaciones honestas y abiertas acerca de las expectativas de P: Vi algo en la empresa que parecía violar el Código.

Dynaflex™ G provides durability and UV stability for cooler feet and wagon wheel tread OnColor™ Frost PET Effect delivered customized color and anti-UV combination for hair care bottle Versaflex™ Thermoplastic Elastomers Customized a soft (Shore A) TPE solution that passed strict tests, including thermal deformation (80°C for 2 hours), UV resistance, and assembly resistance

Parameters used in the RCP 2.6 scenario, which limits the radiative forcing to 2.6 W/m2, included measurable factors i.e. total insured value (TIV) exposed due to the impact of acute (drought, heavy precipitation, heatwaves etc.) and chronic (changing wind patterns, heat stress, sea level rise etc.) physical climate risks based on property value and business interruption in the medium (by 2030) to long term time-horizon (by 2050). Parameters used in the RCP 4.5 scenario, which limits the radiative forcing to 4.5 W/m2, included measurable factors i.e. total insured value (TIV) exposed due to the impact of acute (drought, heavy precipitation, heatwaves etc.) and chronic (changing wind patterns, heat stress, sea level rise etc.) physical climate risks based on property value and business interruption in the medium (by 2030) to long term time-horizon (by 2050). The scenarios chosen for physical climate-related risk scenario analysis are low, intermediate and high based on the RCP 2.6, RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 scenarios. 111 Parameters used in the RCP 4.5 scenario, which assumes the radiative forcing increases up to 8.5 W/m2, included measurable factors i.e. total insured value (TIV) exposed due to the impact of acute (drought, heavy precipitation, heatwaves etc.) and chronic (changing wind patterns, heat stress, sea level rise etc.) physical climate risks based on property value and business interruption in the medium (by 2030) to long term time-horizon (by 2050).